Halle Berry’s new trick

According to a report by in touchShe accused him of “smoking in the mirrors to distract from his conduct”. Currently, he is involved in a custody battle with her. He married her in 2013.

According to court documents obtained by In Touch, Halle, 58, has objected to Olivier’s request to turn over text messages she exchanged with her former employee Miriam Haziza from January and any nondisclosure agreements executed by Miriam. Do it.

In the filing, Halle said that Olivier, 58, also asked her to void any non-disclosure agreement made by Erica Simamora, one of his former employees, with whom (Olivier) conspired with Ms. Haziza, (Hayley) has come to learn – to make a false report against him.

What are their lawyers saying?

It is claimed that Miriam no longer works for Halle after she discovered that Miriam was plotting with Olivier and Erica without her. She accuses her employee of passing information related to Maceo’s therapy (Olivier) to Erica. Maceo is the 11-year-old son of Halle and Olivier.

The lawyer added, “In particular, Ms. Haziza has continued to communicate with (Olivier) and her attorney, while in non-formal discussions with (Halle’s) attorney regarding the content of her intended testimony at the hearing. “Refused to participate.”

Halle alleged that Erica’s “testimony is relevant because (Olivier) inexplicably” persuaded Erica to contact Maceo’s therapist with the “goal of interfering with Maceo’s therapeutic process” while she was employed by Halle. , which is relevant to legal custody.

Halle said that Olivier did not explain the relevance of the potential nondisclosure agreement.

“Instead of focusing on the requested relief, [Olivier] Intends to turn these proceedings into a sham, engage in smoke and mirrors to distract attention from his own conduct and the findings of this Court regarding his conduct, and reasons [Halle] Unnecessary fees will continue to be charged going forward,” Halle’s attorney said.

Halle asked the court to block Olivier’s request.

More information about the case

Earlier this year, Halle revealed in court documents that she sued a former employee for violating the terms of her employment contract and conspiring with Olivier. Olivier recently listed Miriam as a witness whom he plans to call to testify at a December court hearing. He said that Miriam was Halle’s former house manager and nanny, who worked for her for the past 20 years.

The judge will hear from both sides and make a decision on Halle’s request to strip Olivier of legal custody of her son. Meanwhile, Olivier has called the complaint “harsh” and accused Halle of using her wealth to drag him in and out of court.

Olivier has requested that Halle be ordered to pay $360,000 to support her legal team. He said he had to take out a loan and sell his Rolex to pay his current lawyer.