Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie Photo credit: Mark J. Terrill

In a significant development in the long legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, the Los Angeles Superior Court has ordered Jolie to return all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) she signed over the past eight years. The decision is the latest twist in the ongoing dispute over the ownership of their USD 500 million French winery, Chateau Miraval, as confirmed by page six,

The court’s decision mandates that malefic The star must produce all non-privileged documents in his possession, custody or control within the next month in response to requests from Pitt’s legal team. A source close to Pitt described the decision as a “huge blow” to Jolie, who had previously argued that producing an NDA would be “expensive”, “wasteful” and “unfair”, as well as to the third parties involved. There would also be a “violation of confidentiality”.

According to Page Six, the documents in question likely include NDAs related to Hollywood employers, brands, and individual employees, potentially including sensitive information about Jolie’s compensation and contracts with third parties. The court order also requires Jolie to provide a list of all documents she considers privileged, allowing Pitt’s team to evaluate her privilege claims.

The Oscar-winning couple have been embroiled in a legal dispute that has escalated from their divorce, focusing specifically on the Chateau Miraval winery. Jolie’s legal team has accused Pitt of attempting to control her through the exaggerated NDA, which they claim was intended to cover up Pitt’s personal misconduct related to the winery.

.The controversy reportedly hindered Jolie’s agreement to sell her stake in the winery to Pitt, causing her to sell her shares to a subsidiary of the Stolli Group. Pitt has opposed the sale to Jolie, alleging that Jolie acted unfairly in finalizing the deal without his consent. According to page sixA source close to Pitt said the verdict represents another pre-trial victory for him.

However, Jolie’s lawyer Paul Murphy took a different view of the decision, saying, “A normal NDA cannot be compared to the last-minute demand made by Mr. Pitt to conceal his personal misconduct.” He stressed that it is important for the court to acknowledge the potential relevance of the NDA to the case, pointing to broader implications for Pitt’s conduct.

Murphy said, “We welcome transparency in the investigative responses of all parties, including Mr. Pitt. Angelina looks forward to the final end of this lawsuit, which has harmed the false narrative that hurts the family and their ability to recover.” ” A source close to Jolie assured that the NDA is unlikely to be exposed during the trial.